TrustCurveMap the evaluators
Find an evaluator and document its scope, published methods, and independence disclosures.
- First contribution
- One evaluator, with primary source links.
- Useful experience
- Research and source checking.
BUILD THE REFERENCE, TOGETHER
Better evidence.
A shared effort.
Help make AI assurance easier to inspect.
Start with one source, one correction,
or one carefully scoped contribution.
TrustCurve is taking shape. These are proposed volunteer roles. Applications are not being collected yet; you can prepare and download a draft.
Choose a way to contribute
Small contributions welcomeReview the methods
Identify missing evidence, unclear assessment boundaries, or gaps in reproducibility.
- First contribution
- A sourced review of one methodology.
- Useful experience
- AI evaluation or assurance practice.
Improve the registry
Help make records accessible, search useful, and source histories easier to follow.
- First contribution
- One reproducible issue or scoped improvement.
- Useful experience
- Design, accessibility, or software development.
PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION PROCESS
Open contributions.
Accountable review.
Community input should improve the evidence. It should not purchase influence or grant a safety endorsement.
- Document the source
Use public primary sources. Separate the source’s claims from your own observations.
- Disclose your relationship
State employment, funding, or commercial ties. Contributors should not review their own organizations.
- Review before publication
A separate reviewer should check the scope and evidence. Suggestions must not change badges or scores automatically.
- Credit the work
Offer optional contributor credit and record accepted changes in a public history. Both remain planned features.